 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Patents - 1925 - 184 pages
...v. Metcalf (240 US 403) and United Drug Drug Co. v. Rectanus Co. (248 US 90) has made it plain: (1) That "There is no such thing as property in a trade-mark except as a right appertaining to an established business or trade in connection with which the mark is employed." (2)... | |
 | 1923 - 1096 pages
...Ct. 48, 63 L. Ed. 141, as an authority against the appellant's claims. There it was said : "There \a no such thing as property In a trade-mark, except as a right appurtenant to an established business or trade in connection with which the mark is employed. The law of trade-marks... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1928 - 756 pages
...suggested by some very- able lawyers and some very able courts that trade-murks alone are not property. There is no such thing as property In a trade-mark except as a right appurtenant to an established business or trade in connection with which the murk Is employed. * » « The owner of... | |
 | 1924 - 876 pages
...Rectanus Co. (248 US) as an authority against the appellant's claims. There it was said: "There ia no such thing as property in a trade-mark except as a right appurtenant to an established business or trade in connection with which the mark is employed. The law of trade-marks... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1920 - 1206 pages
...a case arising under the Trademark Laws. Trademark — nature of right — necessity of use. •>. There is no such thing as property in a trademark except as a right appurtenant to an established business or trade in connection with which the mark is employed. j I'm- other cases,... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce - 1964 - 1560 pages
...trademark is (not) a right in gross or at large, like a statutory copyright or a patent for an invention. There is no such thing as property in a trademark except as a right appurtenant to an established business or trade in connection, with which the mark is employed. * * * its function... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce - 1964 - 732 pages
...trademark is (not) a right in gross or at large, like a statutory copyright or a patent for an invention. There is no such thing as property in a trademark except as a right appurtenant to an established business or trade in connection with which the mark is employed. * * * its function... | |
 | United States. Federal Trade Commission - 1970 - 1690 pages
...and Unfair Competition, 68 Har. LR 816 (1955). A trademark right is not a right in gross or at large. "There is no such thing as property in a trademark except as a right appurtenant to an established business or trade in connection with which the mark is employed." United Drug Co. v.... | |
| |
There is no such thing as property in a trade-mark except as a right appurtenant to an established business or trade in connection with which the mark is employed. 
