 The differences may be exaggerated or lessened, but to obliterate them it would be necessary to have all the evolution over again on a new basis. What was decided among the prehistoric Protozoa cannot be annulled by Act of Parliament.  Science, Sex, and Society - Page 303by Ann E. Kammer - 1979 - 569 pagesFull view - About this book
 | Lucy Bland - 2002 - 436 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | Richard A. Kaye - 2002 - 264 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | Angelique Richardson - 2003 - 284 pages
...appeared in the same year. In their defence of mental differences between the sexes, its authors remarked 'to obliterate them it would be necessary to have...prehistoric Protozoa cannot be annulled by Act of Parliament.'40 Closely informed by shifting attitudes towards charity, health, and empire, a new, gendered,... | |
 | Steve Jones - 2005 - 276 pages
...deep difference in constitution expresses itself in the distinctions between male and female . . . What was decided among the prehistoric Protozoa cannot be annulled by Act of Parliament." Some still see the influence of prehistory in men's lives, while others, repelled by such fatalism,... | |
 | Gail Hawkes - 2004 - 224 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | N/A Marshall, Anne Witz - 2004 - 236 pages
...influential books on Sex, Geddes and Thomson reversed their notorious earlier verdict that sex differences 'decided among the prehistoric Protozoa cannot be annulled by Act of Parliament' (1889: 267, 1901 : 286). 3 Having learned from feminists like Olive Schreiner, whose Women and Labour... | |
 | Toril Moi - 2005 - 274 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
| |
