 The differences may be exaggerated or lessened, but to obliterate them it would be necessary to have all the evolution over again on a new basis. What was decided among the prehistoric Protozoa cannot be annulled by Act of Parliament.  Science, Sex, and Society - Page 303by Ann E. Kammer - 1979 - 569 pagesFull view - About this book
 | Stanley Chodorow - 1994 - 1052 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | Gail Bederman - 2008 - 322 pages
...sexual difference, both feminist and antifeminist. Geddes and Thompson themselves were antifeminists: "What was decided among the prehistoric Protozoa cannot be annulled by Act of Parliament," they archly told woman suffragists. 103 Yet Gilman, like many other feminists of her generation, found... | |
 | Patricia Gowaty - 1997 - 650 pages
...difference in constitution expresses itself in the distinctions between male and female. These differences may be exaggerated or lessened, but to obliterate...them, it would be necessary to have all the evolution all over again on a new basis. What was decided among the pre-historic protozoa cannot annulled by... | |
 | Lucy Bland, Laura Doan - 1999 - 282 pages
...itself in the distinctions between male and female, whether these be physical or mental. The differences may be exaggerated or lessened, but to obliterate...Protozoa cannot be annulled by Act of Parliament. In this mere outline we cannot of course do more than indicate the relation of the biological differences... | |
 | R. F. M. Byrn - 1998 - 220 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | Ronald L. Numbers, John Stenhouse - 1999 - 316 pages
...They concluded a discussion about the evolution of these tendencies by observing, "the differences may be exaggerated or lessened, but to obliterate...Protozoa cannot be annulled by Act of Parliament." 26 While Geddes and Thompson drew primarily on natural history, biology, and their own experience, the... | |
 | Robert A. Nye - 1999 - 538 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
| |
