 | District of Columbia - 1857 - 788 pages
...umpirage in the following cases : 1. When there is an evident miscalculation of figures, or an evident mistake in the description of any person, thing, or property referred to or mentioned in such award or umpirage, or any evident mistake apparent on the face of such award or... | |
 | New York (State) - 1863 - 944 pages
...Judgment ; Record of Judgment. 1. Where there is an evident miscalculation of figures, or an evident mistake in the description of any person, thing or property referred to in such award : 2. Where the arbitrators shall have awarded upon some matter not submitted to them, not... | |
 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour, New York (State). Supreme Court - 1870 - 722 pages
...correct the award, where there is an evident miscalcuBissell v. Morgan. lation of figures or an evident mistake in the description of any person, thing or property referred to in the award, still the exercise of the power is not exclusively confined to that court, (2 RS 447, ยง 11,) for the... | |
 | American Bar Association - 1921 - 1066 pages
...either party to the submission: (a) Where there was an evident miscalculation of figures, or an evident mistake in the description of any person, thing or property, referred to in the award. (b) Where the arbitrators have awarded upon a matter not submitted to. them, not affecting the merits... | |
 | New York (State) - 1880 - 832 pages
...either party to the submission: 1. Where there was an evident miscalculation of figures, or an evident mistake in the description of any person, thing, or property, referred to in the award. 2. Where the arbitrators have awarded upon a matter not submitted to them, not affecting the merits... | |
 | New York (State) - 1881 - 1532 pages
...either party to the submission : 1. Where there was an evident miscalculation of figures, or an evident mistake in the description of any person, thing, or property, referred to in the award. 2. Where the arbitrators have awarded upon a matter not submitted to them, not affecting the merits... | |
 | Wisconsin. Bureau of Labor and Industrial Statistics - 1901 - 1140 pages
...such award in the following cases: 1. When there is evident miscalculation of figures or an evident mistake in the description of any person, thing or property referred to in such award; 2. Where the arbitrators shall have awarded upon some matter not submitted to them not... | |
 | James Newton Fiero - 1887 - 772 pages
...either party to the submission: 1. Where there was an evident miscalculation of figures, or an evident mistake in the description of any person, thing or property referred to in the award. 2. Where the arbitrators have awarded upon a matter not submitted to them, not affecting the merits... | |
 | 1887 - 814 pages
...either party to the submission : 1. Where there was an evident miscalculation of figures, or an evident mistake in the description of any person, thing, or property, referred to in the award. 2. Where the arbitrators have awarded upon a matter not submitted to tbern, not affecting the merits... | |
 | 1907 - 1220 pages
...corrected are as follows : "(1) Where there was an evident miscalculation of figures, or an evident mistake In the description of any person, thing, or property, referred to in the award. (2) \Vliere the arbitrators have awarded upon a matter not submitted to them, not affect injr the merits... | |
| |
... (a) Where there was an evident material miscalculation of figures or an evident material mistake in the description of any person, thing, or property referred to in the award. 
