Pretrial Settlement Conference: An EvaluationDepartment of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, 1979 - 184 pages |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Analysis of variance arraignment assigned Assistant State Attorney attendance attitudes Chapter closed comparison judges conference and non-conference conference conditions conference date conference procedure conference process conference session control groups court system criminal justice system Dade County decision defendant's defense attorney Differences Among Treatment discussion dropped drug ence evaluation extent F-ratio felony ference findings go to trial guilty implementation incarceration indicate involved Judge A Judge Judge A's judge's judges and attorneys jurisdiction lay participation lay parties mean score measure method of disposition non-attenders observer Office parison judge pattern percent person plea bargaining plea negotiations pretrial settlement conference prior record proportion Public Defender reported respondents role SAMPLE COPY satisfaction scheduled sentence severity settle significantly statistically significant tentative settlement test and control test group tests for differences three judges three test judges tion treatment conditions treatment effects trial date type of offense victims and defendants victims and police