Civil Rights: July 13, 14,15, 19, 20, 26, 27, 28, August 4, 1966, and appendicesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1966 |
Common terms and phrases
14th amendment alleged appearance bonds arrested Attorney General KATZENBACH AUTRY bail bill of indictment Chairman charged citizens City Civil Rights Act Clerk color commerce clause Committee Congress Constitutional Rights convicted defendant denial denied due process EMLEN equal protection equal protection clause evidence excluded exempt exercise fact Federal court Federal Government Fourteenth Amendment freedom grand jury habeas corpus individual injunction interstate commerce Interview Judge RIVERS judgment jury box jury commission jury commissioners jury list jury panel jury selection jury service Justice MUSMANNO L.Ed legislation ment motion to quash names national origin North Carolina owner person petit jury problem proposed prospective jurors provisions qualified question questionnaire real estate broker reason record religion removal S.Ct sell Senator DIRKSEN Senator ERVIN Senator JAVITS serve SPEISER statement statute subcommittee Superior Court supra Supreme Court tion trial U.S. DISTRICT COURT U.S. Senate Union County United violation
Popular passages
Page 995 - Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.
Page 1525 - Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to apply different standards of compensation, or different terms, conditions, or privileges of employment pursuant to a bona fide seniority or merit system, or a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production or to employees who work in different locations, provided that such differences are not the result of an intention to discriminate because of race, color, religion,...
Page 1548 - All men are by nature free and independent, and have certain inalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty; acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; and pursuing and obtaining safety- and happiness.
Page 1343 - Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate, than that these people are to be free ; nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government.
Page 1524 - It shall be an unlawful employment practice for any employer, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining, including on-thejob training programs to discriminate against any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in admission to, or employment in, any program established to provide apprenticeship or other training.
Page 989 - State court, for any cause whatsoever, against any person who is denied or cannot enforce in the judicial tribunals of the State, or in the part of the State where such suit or prosecution is pending, any right secured to him by any law providing for the equal civil rights of citizens of the United States...
Page 1573 - States shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the accommodations, advantages, facilities, and privileges of inns, public conveyances on land or water, theaters, and other places of public amusement; subject only to the conditions and limitations established by law, and applicable alike to citizens of every race and color, regardless of any previous condition of servitude.
Page 1133 - States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and. convey real and personal property...
Page 1665 - The present case, then, concerns a relationship lying within the zone of privacy created by several fundamental constitutional guarantees. And it concerns a law which, in forbidding the use of contraceptives rather than regulating their manufacture or sale, seeks to achieve its goals by means having a maximum destructive impact upon that relationship.
Page 1708 - States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending.