...NY 67. 96. »frllK*nce — Dangerous Instruments. — Handle of valve used to Hush toilets is not so reasonably certain to place life and limb in peril when negligently made as to require manufacturer to make it carefully under penalty of liability to persons other than immediate...

...67. 96. BTegrUg-enee — Dangerous Instruments. — Handle of valve used to flush toilets is not so reasonably certain to place life and limb in peril when negligently made as to require manufacturer to make it carefully under penalty of liability to persons other than immediate...

...conditions, are the tests and standards of our law. We hold, then, that the principle of Thomas v. Winchester is not limited to poisons, explosives and things of like nature, to things which in their normal nature are implements of destruction. If the nature of a thing is such__that it is reasonably certai"...

...of themselves? Judge Cardozo wrote extending the law to include them, saying: "If the nature of the thing is such that it is reasonably certain to place life and limb in danger when negligently made, it is then a thing of danger." The Court of Appeals had held the statute...

...finished product placed on the market by a manufacturer to be used without inspection by his consumer is such that it is reasonably certain to place life and limb in peril if the product is negligently made, it is then a thing of danger. Its nature gives warning of the consequences...

...finished product placed on the market by a manufacturer to be used without inspection by his consumer is such that it is reasonably certain to place life and limb in peril if the product is negligently made, it is then a thing of danger. Its nature gives warning of the consequences...

...Minnesota case before the Buick decision,12 the best statement of it is still embodied in that case. "If the nature of a thing is such that it is reasonably...in peril when negligently made, it is then a thing •Devlin v. Smith, 89 NY 470 (1882). <Kahner v. Otis Elevator Co., 96 App. Div. (NY) 169 (1904). •Statler...

...actions where injuries had been caused by drugs, poisons and foods. [13] to all defective products. "If the nature of a thing is such that it is reasonably...peril when negligently made, it is then a thing of danger."[14] "Warranty In warranty there are two general categories : Express and Implied. The express...

...became a Supreme Court justice, held that the manufacturer's liability did extend to the user, because "If the nature of a thing is such that it is reasonably...life and limb in peril when negligently made, it is a thing of danger; and if to the element of danger there is added knowledge that the thing will be...

...dangerous," can provide the basis for recovery in negligence by a person lacking privity if the product "is reasonably certain to place life and limb in peril when negligently made" and "there is added knowledge that the thing will be used by persons other than the purchaser, and...