Presidential Campaign Activities of 1972, Senate Resolution 60: Watergate and Related Activities, Volume 1, Book 18; Volume 18U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973 - 12966 pages |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities administration areas asked assistant award aware believe Bill Horton Black Vote Bob Brown brochures Cabinet campaign Chairman Colson Committee To Re-Elect communications CONGRESS THE LIBRARY constituent group contract coordinating dated Davison Departmental develop Director discussed document referred Domestic Council effort EHRLICHMAN elderly enrollees ensure FEA's Federal field organization Flemming Fred Malek FREEDMAN funds Gifford going Government H. R. HALDEMAN HALDEMAN HAMILTON Harry Flemming HERSHMAN impact involved issues Jones June LAPHAM LIBRARY OF CONGRESS March 17 marked Evans marked Malek exhibit Marumoto meeting memo memorandum million Mitchell Older Americans personnel political President President's re-election priorities problems project manager proposal question recall request Responsiveness Program Rob Davison role Secretary Senator MONTOYA Senior Citizens Spanish-speaking specific Stan Anderson talked testimony things tion Todd told voters Voting Bloc White House staff Zavala County
Popular passages
Page 8282 - An employee may not use his official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election.
Page 8493 - The Director may contract or provide financial assistance for pilot or demonstration projects conducted by public or private agencies which are designed to test or assist in the development of new approaches or methods that will aid in overcoming special problems or otherwise in furthering the purposes of this title.
Page 8282 - No discrimination shall be exercised, threatened, or promised by any person in the executive branch of the Federal Government...
Page 8492 - ... social development (section 131 of the Act). §51.2 Definitions. As used in this part, the term: (a) "Act" means the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, as amended (42 USC 2701 et seq.) . (b) "Chronically unemployed...
Page 8227 - And, secondly, to take all of the patronage requests that were sent to them directly by the Congress or through us to them and funnel them to the appropriate place in the department for consideration. So that if we would forward to them, or if a Congressman would forward to them...
Page 8305 - Gilford has made some 35 requests. Most of these involved expediting the normal grant reviewing process and securing the release of information. Approximately a dozen of these requests resulted in favorable grant decisions (which otherwise would not have been made) involving
Page 8344 - OMB-Departmental network and operating procedures must be established to fulfill the above objectives. . This paper discusses how the proposed network and procedures would fulfill the objectives and then covers implementation steps. ENSURING SPECIAL CONSIDERATION To ensure politically sensitive grant applications receive appropriate consideration, two basic steps must be carried out: (1) determine which grants are politically sensitive and (2) ensure these grants receive positive consideration from...
Page 8284 - States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which such inquiry or investigation is- being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress...
Page 8219 - As a first step, the Departments should be given clear guidelines covering the political priorities, the types of operating decisions which are to be included in the program, and the procedures for planning and tracking progress. "The political priorities would be spelled out in terms of key States and major voting bloc groups upon which Departmental action could have an impact. The Departments would be updated as needed, as the political priorities evolve. "Next, the types of activities covered...
Page 8243 - California as a part of the Responsiveness Program. Under Mr. Davison's proposal, an individual whom the White House would designate, but who would not be an employee of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, with an appropriate delegation of authority from the Secretary, would make the decision as to how those monies were to be committed, ie, which cities and towns in California would receive those funds. I told Mr. Davison that...