Preferences and Procedures: European Union Legislative Decision-MakingSpringer Science & Business Media, 2006 M03 7 - 99 pages Preferences and Procedures presents and tests game-theoretic models of European Union legislative decision-making. It is inspired by the idea of linking statistical testing strategies firmly to formal models of EU policymaking. After describing salient features of the EU legislative process and comparing different models of how the EU negotiates new legislative measures, the models' predictive power is evaluated. On a more general level, Preferences and Procedures answers questions regarding the empirically recognizable effects of institutional arrangements on joint bargaining outcomes. |
Contents
CHAPTER | 1 |
Current Empirical Evidence | 15 |
CHAPTER 3 | 28 |
2 | 34 |
GERMANY ITALY AND THE UNITED KINGDOM | 48 |
CHAPTER 6 | 58 |
Other editions - View all
Preferences and Procedures: European Union Legislative Decision-Making Torsten J. Selck Limited preview - 2006 |
Common terms and phrases
actors adopt amendments analysis applies approach arrangements assumes assumptions Authority better chapter coalition codecision procedure Commission committee common compared concerning Constitution consultation procedure cooperation procedure Council Council members Crombez decision dimensionality dimensions discussion distance effects empirical European Parliament European Union legislative existing expert explain fact Figure focus formal France Germany important indicate institutional integration issues Italy legislative procedures legislative process mean measure median Member negotiations Note organization outcome players policymaking political position possible predict preferences present Presidency proposal qualified majority question rational choice theory reason regarding relative represents role rules salience situation space spatial models specific status quo Steunenberg structure studies success Table theoretical theory Treaty Tsebelis unanimity UNION LEGISLATIVE DECISION-MAKING United voters voting