Chaucer, Boccaccio, and the Debate of Love: A Comparative Study of the Decameron and the Canterbury TalesOxford University Press, 1999 - 354 pages The two collections are examined in the light of their literary diversity, their shape as a form of quodlibet debate, their discussion of literature and its autonomy, using the oppositions of utile-diletto and 'sentence'-'solaas', and in the specific way that individual narratives are treated so as to create a labyrinthine web for the reader both to negotiate and to enjoy. This is the fullest attempt yet to demonstrate the weight of evidence linking Chaucer's work to the Decameron and to disprove the stance, take early this century, that Chaucer was not directly indebted to it. |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Accessus allegory ambiguous amor appearance and reality audience Belcolore Branca Branca's note brigata Cambridge Canterbury Canterbury Tales Chapter characters ciò Cipolla Clerk's Tale collection comedy comic Concl context cose courtly love critical Dante Dante's Decameron Dioneo discussion diversity Ethics exemplary exemplum fabliau fiction Filocolo Fragment VII Franklin's Tale genre Gentilesse gives Griselda Gualtieri husband Ibid interpretation Italian knight Knight's Tale labyrinth lady literary literature London lover marriage marriage debate meaning Medieval Melibee merchant Merchant's Tale Messer metaphor Miller's Tale Minnis Monk moral narrative narrator nature noble novella novelle Nun's Nun's Priest Nun's Priest's Tale Oxford Panfilo perhaps Petrarch pilgrims piú portrayed priest Princeton Prologue quale reader reading Reeve's Tale relate reminds repr response Riverside romance says seen sexual Shipman's Tale solaas Sources and Analogues Tarolfo theme things tion trans truth University Press variety VIII virtue wife wish woman women words young