Oversight Hearing, Developments in Labor Law Affecting the Construction Industry: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Labor-Management Relations of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, First Session, Hearing Held in Washington, D.C., on March 8, 1983
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. Subcommittee on Labor-Management Relations
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984 - 117 pages
Other editions - View all
administrative law judge AFL-CIO antitrust bargain collectively bargaining unit Board's decision breasted building trades BURTON Chairman circuit court collective bargaining agreement competitive Congress intended Connell construction industry craft unions decertification DIEGO LAW REVIEW double-breasted operations dustry election procedure employee free choice employment enforce ERLENBORN filed GEORGINE H.G. FOSTER hiring hall indus issue Kiewit and South Labor Relations Act Labor Relations Board majority status majority support McDowell ment National Labor Relations NLRA NLRB Dec NLRB's nonunion NORTHRUP & H.G. open shop contractors Operating Engineers organization Peter Kiewit Peter Kiewit Sons picketing ployees prehire agreement problem RELATIONS AND MANPOWER Representation SAN DIEGO represented repudiate ROBERT GEORGINE ROUKEMA SAN DIEGO LAW section 8(f South Prairie STIGLITZ struction industry subcontracting supra note Supreme Court Taft-Hartley Taft-Hartley Act Thank unfair labor practice union agreement Union Representation SAN unit question wages Wagner Act workers
Page 29 - Employees shall have the right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection, and shall also have the right to refrain from any or all of such activities...
Page 62 - So long as a union acts in its self-interest and does not combine with non-labor groups, the licit and the illicit under § 20 are not to be distinguished by any judgment regarding the wisdom or unwisdom, the Tightness or wrongness, the selfishness or unselfishness of the end of which the particular union activities are the means.
Page 71 - Representatives designated or selected for the purposes of collective bargaining by the majority of the employees in a unit appropriate for such purposes, shall be the exclusive representatives of all the employees in such unit for the purposes of collective bargaining in respect to rates of pay, wages, hours of employment, or other conditions of employment...
Page 71 - Act, assuring employees the right "to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing" or "to refrain from
Page 24 - Employer, that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act, and that the purposes of the Act will best be served if we assume jurisdiction in this case.
Page 25 - Woll, the court found that the act of establishing a company that would operate nonunion "constituted a very substantial qualitative degree of centralized control of labor relations.
Page 60 - Provided, That nothing in this subsection (e) shall apply to an agreement between a labor organization and an employer in the construction industry relating to the contracting or subcontracting of work to bo done at the site of the construction, alteration, painting, or repair of a building, structure, or other work: Provided further, That for the purposes of this subsection (e) and section 8(b)(4)(B) the terms "any employer...
Page 27 - The Board shall decide in each case whether, in order to assure to employees the fullest freedom in exercising the rights guaranteed by this Act...
Page 25 - ... interrelations of operations, common management, centralized control of labor relations, and common ownership or financial control of the employer and the entity.
Page 62 - US 184, 209, an elimination of price competition based on differences in labor standards is the objective of any national labor organization. But this effect on competition has not been considered to be the kind of curtailment of price competition prohibited by the Sherman Act.