Pretrial Settlement Conference: An Evaluation

Analysis of variance arraignment assigned attendance attitudes Chapter closed comparison judges conference and non-conference conference conditions conference procedure conference process conference session Control Control control groups court system courtroom differences criminal justice system Dade County decision defendant's defense attorneys defense counsel Differences Among Conference Differences Among Judges Differences Among Treatment discussion dropped ence evaluation extent F-ratio felony ference findings go to trial guilty implementation incarceration indicate involved Judge A Judge Judge A's judge's judicial style jurisdiction lay participation lay parties Location of Differences mean score measure method of disposition non-attenders number of issues observer Office parison judge pattern percent plea bargaining plea negotiations pretrial settlement conference prior record proportion Public Defender reported respondents role scheduled sentence severity settle significantly subject changes test and control test group tests for differences three judges three test judges tion treatment conditions treatment effects victims and defendants victims and police