Inquiry and Change

Front Cover
Yale University Press, 1990 M01 1 - 314 pages
0 Reviews
Reviews aren't verified, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified
Winner of the American Political Science Association’s 1991 Woodrow Wilson Foundation Book Award for the best book published in the United States during 1990 on government, politics, or international affairs

How do ordinary citizens, government officials, opinion leaders, or social scientists attempt to solve social problems? How competent are we at defining the problems, seeking information, and finding answers? In this important and controversial book, a distinguished social scientist meticulously analyzes our attempt to understand society so that we can reshape it. In so doing, he largely bypasses both epistemology and contemporary highly abstract theory on knowledge and society in order to acheive a far more concrete analysis of discourse and inquiry in social problem solving. There is a tragic discrepancy, argues Charles E. Lindblom, between our abilities to solve problems and the difficulty of the problems to be solved. We must make do with inadequate information and inconclusive analyses, for the task is less one of learning the truth than of proceeding in inquiry and decisions when the truth cannot be known. Lindblom discusses the many obstacles that prevent us from solving social problems, focusing in particular on learned incompetence. According to Lindblom, parents teach children not to think certain thoughts, and schools often engage more in indoctrination than education. Political rhetoric and commercial sales promotion feed a steady diet of misrepresentation. Social science does help. But because it is dependent on popular thought, it shares the impairments of thought found in both political figures and ordinary citizens. It also develops its own distinctive impairments and is to a degree crippled by its narrow view of scientific method--often more interested in proving than probing. Although social science can be improved in ways that Lindblom outlines in his book, social inquiry calls for such significant contributions from lay thought that it renders many conventional ideals of scientific problem solving inappropriate. Lindblom contends that the route to better social problem solving is not through either scientific or popular consensus or agreement, however much they are valued in the world of science and social science, but through a competition of ideas. The index of a society's competence, he states, is in its discord over ends, values, or purposes. "As usual, Lindblom cuts through to the core of the issue: How is society to understand its central problems and challenges? With originality and courage, he takes on the social scientists and the policy analysts, and presents an inspiring picture of a self-guiding democracy that continuously deliberates over means and ends. A signal contribution."--Robert B. Reich, Harvard University
 

What people are saying - Write a review

Reviews aren't verified, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified

LibraryThing Review

User Review  - thcson - LibraryThing

This is an original contribution to political theory and readers of Lindblom's other books will find themselves in familiar territory. The main argument is that our understanding of society is limited ... Read full review

Contents

Volitions
17
Probing
29
Inquiry Imposition and Partisanship
45
Impaired Probing
59
Elite and Other Advantaged Sources of Impairing Influences
78
Contemporary Elites
100
Convergences as Evidence of Impairment
118
What Can Social Scientists Do?
135
Professional Help for Lay Probing
175
Professional Impairment
192
Scientific Society and SelfGuiding Society
213
Multiplism Pluralism and Mutual Adjustment
231
Some Questions about Professional Inquiry for a SelfGuiding
257
Reducing Impairment
284
Index
303
Copyright

Professional Dependence on Lay Probing
157

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (1990)


Charles E. Lindblom is Sterling Professor Emeritus of Economics and Political Science at Yale University.

Bibliographic information