Telecom Antitrust HandbookAmerican Bar Association, 2005 - 618 pages "Since enactment of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the telecommunications industry has evolved rapidly. Applying antitrust principles to an industry in flux has posed new challenges and produced a new body of governing precedents. This Guide is intended to serve as a comprehensive review of the applicable law and an invaluable resource for both telecom and antitrust practitioners who contend with the myriad competitive issues that arise in this fluid industry and fluid area of the law." -- from the Foreword, p. xiii. |
Contents
ECONOMIC UNDERPINNINGS THE ECONOMICS OF COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS MARKET POWER AND VERTICAL FORECLOSURE... | 1 |
C Basic Network Economics and Sources of Market Power in the Communications Industries | 4 |
1 An Overview of Communications Networks | 5 |
2 Economies of Scale | 6 |
3 Economies of Density | 7 |
4 Economies of Scope | 8 |
6 Interconnection Standards and Compatibility | 11 |
7 Price Regulation | 12 |
b Horizontal v Vertical Relationships | 267 |
2 Antitrust Implications of Particular Licensing Practices | 268 |
a CrossLicensing and Patent Pooling | 269 |
b Package Licensing | 271 |
c Grantbacks | 273 |
d Territorial and FieldofUse Restrictions | 275 |
MONOPOLIZATION IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKETS | 279 |
2 Justice Department and Private Antitrust Litigation 197483 | 284 |
D Market Definition | 14 |
2 The Link Among Market Definition Market Power and Competitive Effects | 16 |
E Economic Theories of Vertical Foreclosure And Raising Rivals Costs | 19 |
2 Economic Theories of Foreclosure | 21 |
1 Opportunity Cost | 22 |
2 The Single Monopoly Profit Critique | 23 |
b Procompetitive Efficiency Reasons for Vertical Integration | 24 |
1 Reducing Transactions Costs and Improving Coordination | 25 |
3 Elimination Of Double Marginalization | 26 |
1 Circumventing Regulation | 27 |
2 Facilitating Price Discrimination | 28 |
3 The New Industrial Organization Approach to Vertical Foreclosure | 30 |
d Alternative Methods of Foreclosure | 34 |
2 Price Squeeze | 35 |
3 Tying and Bundling as Exclusionary Practices | 39 |
3 Application to Telecommunications Markets | 41 |
b Maintaining Divestiture Restrictions on RBOCs | 45 |
c Price Regulation and Vertical Foreclosure | 49 |
d Reciprocal Compensation as a Potential Foreclosure Vehicle | 51 |
e Number HoardingNumbering Administration as a Potential Foreclosure Vehicle | 54 |
HORIZONTAL MERGERS | 57 |
B Overview of Legal Standards | 58 |
b Application of the Sherman Act | 63 |
c The 1992 Horizontal Merger Guidelines | 64 |
d Mergers Among Potential Competitors | 67 |
1 The Elimination of Perceived Potential Competitors | 68 |
HSR Waiting Periods and Second Requests | 69 |
2 The Communications Act | 70 |
b The Standards Applied by the FCC | 72 |
2 The Substantive Effect of the Public Interest Standard on Merger Review at the FCC | 75 |
FCC REVIEW OF THE BANYNEX MERGER | 80 |
C PROCEDURES FOR FCC MERGER REVIEW | 83 |
a State Enforcement of Federal Law | 84 |
b State Law | 85 |
4 State Public Utility Laws | 86 |
5 Local Franchise Laws | 88 |
C Application of Legal Standards to Telecommunications Mergers | 93 |
3 Market Concentration Entry and Expansion | 94 |
4 Actual versus Potential Competition | 99 |
5 Telecommunications as a Dynamic Industry | 102 |
6 The Role of Network Effects | 104 |
7 Failing Firms and Divisions | 108 |
D Efficiencies | 111 |
2 Efficiencies and the FCC | 115 |
E Remedies | 117 |
a Structural Relief | 118 |
b Conduct Remedies | 120 |
c Preliminary Injunctions | 122 |
d Hold Separate Orders | 124 |
2 FCC Remedies | 126 |
F Private Enforcement | 131 |
2 Deciding Whether and When To Sue | 133 |
3 Preliminary Injunctions | 137 |
4 Discovery | 139 |
VERTICAL MERGERS | 143 |
B The Vertical Integration of Telecommunications Markets | 145 |
C Theories of Anticompetitive Harm | 147 |
2 The Foreclosure Theory of Antitrust Harm | 148 |
3 The Shift to a Focus on Raising Rivals Costs | 149 |
D Application to the Telecom Industry | 151 |
1 Vertical Integration of Interexchange ProviderEquipment Supplier with Wireless Provider | 152 |
2 Vertical Integration of Interexchange Provider and Dominant Local ExchangeServices Provider | 155 |
b United States v Sprint Corporation and Joint Venture Co | 157 |
c ATTBritish Telecom | 159 |
3 Vertical Integration of Internet Backbone Service Providers | 161 |
b United States v WorldCom Inc and Sprint Corporation | 162 |
c WorldComIntermedia | 163 |
4 Vertical Integration of Interexchange Provider and Cable Provider | 164 |
5 Vertical Integration of ISP and Cable Provider | 165 |
JOINT VENTURES | 171 |
2 Types of Telecommunications Joint Ventures | 173 |
b Marketing Joint Ventures | 174 |
c FullyIntegrated Joint Ventures | 175 |
B Antitrust Analysis of Joint Ventures | 176 |
1 Joint Ventures in the Courts | 177 |
b The Rule of Reason | 179 |
c Section 7 Analysis | 184 |
2 DOJ and FTC Enforcement | 185 |
a Competitor Collaboration Guidelines Application of the Per Se Rule | 187 |
b Competitor Collaboration Guidelines Application of the Rule of Reason | 189 |
2 The Collaboration Market | 190 |
3 Continued Competition Among Participants | 191 |
4 Entry | 192 |
5 Cognizable Efficiencies | 193 |
C Telecommunications Joint Ventures | 194 |
2 NonAntitrust Factors Weighed | 197 |
3 Anticompetitive Risks of Telecom Joint Ventures | 198 |
b Loss of Potential Competition | 202 |
Three Years Later | 203 |
2 PrimeCo Personal Communications LP | 205 |
3 Cingular SBCBellSouth Wireless | 208 |
4 Ameritech US West and Qwest | 211 |
c Market Exclusion and Access Discrimination | 214 |
1 The Role of Infrastructure | 215 |
d International Issues | 216 |
1 MCIBritish Telecom | 217 |
2 ATTBritish Telecom | 218 |
3 SprintFrance TelecomDeutsche Telekom | 221 |
RESTRAINTS OF TRADE | 225 |
2 Intraenterprise Conspiracy | 226 |
3 Per se v Rule of Reason Analysis | 227 |
4 State Law vs Federal Law | 230 |
B Horizontal Restraints | 231 |
2 Market AllocationOutput Restriction | 234 |
b Ancillary Services | 236 |
d International Services Provided Via Undersea Cables | 237 |
e International Services Via Satellite | 238 |
3 Group Boycotts | 239 |
b Issues for Virtual Networks | 241 |
4 Information Exchanges Standard Setting and Protocols | 243 |
1 The FTC Approach | 245 |
2 Antitrust Concerns Specific to Information Exchanges | 247 |
b Standards and Protocols | 249 |
C Vertical Restraints | 251 |
1 Vertical v Horizontal Relationships | 252 |
2 Vertical Price Fixing | 253 |
a Telecommunications Equipment | 254 |
b Telecommunications Services | 255 |
4 Exclusive Dealing | 256 |
5 Tying | 258 |
b Telecommunications Services | 259 |
c The Computer Inquiries | 260 |
d Joint Marketing Restrictions | 261 |
e Telecommunications Equipment | 263 |
6 MostFavored Nation Clauses | 264 |
D Intellectual Property Licensing | 265 |
1 The Intellectual Property Guidelines | 266 |
b Private Litigation | 286 |
3 The Telecommunications Act of 1996 | 288 |
4 Implementing the 1996 Act | 293 |
B Elements of a Section 2 Violation | 298 |
a Determining the Relevant Market | 299 |
2 Geographic Market | 303 |
b Possession of Monopoly Power | 305 |
2 Other Factors That May Affect the Inference of Monopoly Power | 306 |
3 How These Factors Apply to Telecommunications | 307 |
2 Attempted Monopolization | 308 |
C Particular Section 2 Theories | 309 |
2 Monopoly Leveraging | 312 |
3 Refusal to Deal | 313 |
4 Price Squeeze | 314 |
5 Raising Rivals Costs | 318 |
6 Preannouncement | 319 |
7 Predatory Pricing | 320 |
b Average Variable Cost | 321 |
c LongRun Incremental Cost | 323 |
1 Pre1996 Act Authority | 324 |
b Regulation as Fact of Market Life | 326 |
c Regulation as Affirmative Defense | 329 |
d Regulation as Remedy | 330 |
E Remedies | 333 |
b Damage Methodologies | 334 |
2 The YardstickModel | 336 |
3 Market Share Theory | 337 |
c Burden of Proof | 338 |
d Disaggregation | 339 |
2 Equitable Relief | 341 |
a Purpose Requisites and Burden | 342 |
1 Controls on Conduct | 343 |
A PRELIMINARY RELIEF | 344 |
B PROSPECTIVE RELIEF | 345 |
2 Structural Remedies | 346 |
c Application of Antitrust Oversight to Regulated Industries | 348 |
IMMUNITIES | 353 |
B Verizon v Trinko | 355 |
C The State Action Doctrine | 356 |
1 The Midcal Test | 357 |
2 State Action Immunity of Local Governments | 358 |
3 The State Action Doctrine Applied to Telecommunications Cases | 359 |
D Solicitation of Government Action | 361 |
2 Petitioning the Government | 363 |
1 Applicability to Telecommunications | 364 |
1 Applicability to Telecommunications | 366 |
B TARIFF FILINGS | 367 |
c NoerrPennington Applied to Private Standards Bodies | 368 |
d Sham Exception | 369 |
1 Applicability to Telecommunications | 371 |
e Government Acting as Buyer or Seller | 373 |
E Inducement of Government Action By Improper Means | 374 |
3 Use of False Information | 375 |
4 Corruption Bribery Conspiracy with Public Officials | 378 |
Implied Immunities | 379 |
2 Implied Immunity and the FCC | 381 |
Predatory Pricing | 383 |
G Primary Jurisdiction | 384 |
2 Primary Jurisdiction Referrals to the FCC | 386 |
3 Primary Jurisdiction Referrals to State Regulatory Commissions | 388 |
4 The Status of a Case Pending Primary Jurisdiction | 389 |
H The Filed Rate Doctrine | 390 |
2 The Doctrine as Applied in Telecommunications Cases | 392 |
CONSUMER PROTECTION TRENDS | 395 |
B Consumer Protection in the Telecommunications Marketplace | 396 |
2 Cramming | 401 |
3 Negative Option Billing | 403 |
4 Deceptive Advertising | 404 |
5 Unfair Practices | 405 |
6 PayPerCall and Information Services | 406 |
7 Collection Practices and Consumer Liability For Unauthorized Charges | 409 |
8 Quality of Service | 411 |
9 Telemarketing | 412 |
10 Telephone Subscriber Privacy | 416 |
C Jurisdiction over Unfair and Coercive Practices in the Deregulated Telecommunications Marketplace | 418 |
2 State Response To Consumer Protection Issues | 420 |
3 Private Response to Consumer Protection Issues | 421 |
Tariffs the Filed Rate Doctrine and Other Vestiges of the Regulatory Era | 422 |
E Future Trends | 424 |
INTERNATIONAL ISSUES | 427 |
2 Basic Principles | 431 |
a Market Definition | 432 |
b Particular Types of Conduct | 434 |
2 Abuse Of Dominance and Other Civilly Reviewable Practices | 437 |
3 Mergers | 440 |
4 Fair Marketing Practices Misleading Advertising | 445 |
5 Regulated Conduct Doctrine | 446 |
3 Competition Law Principles Applied by the CR TC | 447 |
4 Interplay Between the Jurisdictions of the CRTC and Commissioner in the Telecommunications Industry | 449 |
a Matters Forborne or Exempted From CRTC Regulation | 450 |
b Common CRTC and Commissioner of Competition Authority | 451 |
c Exclusive CRTC Authority | 452 |
f Conclusions | 457 |
2 Outline of Antitrust Laws in the EU and EU Member States | 461 |
1 Article 81 Prohibition of Anticompetitive Agreements Decisions and Concerted Practices | 466 |
2 Article 82 Prohibition of Abuse of a Dominant Position | 468 |
3 Article 86 Abolition of Exclusive or Special Rights | 472 |
4 Merger Regulation | 475 |
5 Reform of the Merger Regulation | 479 |
b National Regimes | 481 |
2 France | 484 |
3 Germany | 485 |
5 The Netherlands | 487 |
3 Commission Decisions in the Telecom Sector | 488 |
b Third Generation Mobile Infrastructure Sharing | 490 |
c Mergers and Acquisitions in the Telecom Sector | 491 |
1 TeliaTelenor | 492 |
2 TeliaSonera | 493 |
4 The Interaction Between Telecomspecific Law and Antitrust Law | 494 |
b The Interaction Between the 1998 Regulatory Framework and Antitrust Law | 495 |
c The New EU Regulatory Framework | 496 |
d A New Era for Sectorspecific Regulation | 503 |
AN OVERVIEW OF COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS | 505 |
2 Regulation of the PSTN | 509 |
B Cable Television Systems | 511 |
C Fixed Wireless Networks | 516 |
D Commercial Mobile Radio Services | 517 |
E Broadcast Television and Radio | 522 |
F Satellite Networks | 528 |
G Internet Access Networks | 529 |
ADDITIONAL ECONOMIC CONCEPTS | 533 |
2 Recent Developments | 534 |
B Application of Vertical Foreclosure Theories to Telecommunications Markets | 537 |
2 The Efficient Components Pricing Rule ECPR | 539 |
TABLE OF CASES | 543 |
575 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action addition agencies agreement alleged allow analysis anticompetitive antitrust laws application approved AT&T authority Bell cable calls carriers challenge claims Commission Communications companies compete competition competitors complaint concerns conduct considered consumers Corp costs court customers decision determine Directive discussed doctrine dominant downstream effects efficiencies enforcement entry example exchange federal filed finding firm Guidelines impose incentive increase incumbent industry input integration interconnection interest Internet involving issues joint venture license limited long-distance market power merger monopoly offer operators parties plaintiff potential practices profits prohibited proposed protection raise rates reason regulation regulatory relevant remedies Report restrictions result rivals rule Second share significant specific standard Supp supra note telecom telecommunications telephone television Trade transaction United vertical violation wireless