Rules for the Transfer of Movables: A Candidate for European Harmonisation Or National Reforms?Comparative research in the area of property law is gaining importance. Against the background of the current discussion of developing model rules, aimed at facilitating European private law harmonization, and of ongoing law reform projects in a number of EU Member States, this volume addresses key issues in the field of the transfer of corporeal movable property. Authors from various European countries discuss classical issues of property law, such as the dichotomies of "consensual" versus "delivery" and "causal" versus "abstract" transfer systems, good faith acquisition, and the role of party autonomy in the field of the transfer of ownership. In addition, a special focus is given to the less well-known - but at least equally fundamental - difference between "unitary" transfer approaches, as applied in continental Europe, and the "functional" approach, as followed in Scandinavian countries. Further contributions discuss fiduciary transfers, avoidance in bankruptcy, the question of where to draw the line between obligatory and proprietary rights, the role of intellectual property rights, possession, and the EU law basis for the harmonization of property law. These contributions were presented at a conference held in Salzburg in February 2007, forming part of the activities of the working group "Transfer of Movables" within the "Study Group on a European Civil Code." |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Preface | 1 |
Goals of working group | 7 |
Consensual systems of transfer | 14 |
Delivery tradition systems of transfer | 29 |
E Arguments in favour of a functional approach | 35 |
F Conclusion | 45 |
Aspects of transfer parties might wish to modify to suit their interests | 52 |
An Abstract or a Causal System | 59 |
Rights of priority | 130 |
H Simulation | 136 |
Three possible approaches | 144 |
E Protecting the interests of trade and the rise of ecommerce | 150 |
B Portuguese law general rules | 156 |
Fiduciary Transfer and Ownership | 161 |
Division in time | 167 |
B Consequences and limits of this summa divisio | 190 |
The animus theory | 66 |
B Go straight to the problem Ownership is a detour | 72 |
Form the questions functionally Ownership is not a real concern | 78 |
F Use ownership relationally | 84 |
H Keep problems aparteven if they seem to be assembled | 90 |
Scepticism about the Functional Approach from a Unitary Perspective | 97 |
Interdependencies between various aspects and relations | 111 |
E Scepticism related to exporting the functional approach to | 117 |
The Relationship between Transfer Rules and Rules on Creditors | 123 |
The German Property Law and its Principles | 197 |
Numerus dausus | 206 |
E Some recommendations | 214 |
The relevance of IPrights for European private law | 228 |
E Conclusions | 236 |
Unification in the Field of Property Law from | 239 |
Main characteristics of the new system 25 | 253 |
List of Contributors | 267 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abstract according acquirer acquisition action actual agreement already apply approach arguments aspects asset Austrian bona fide buyer Civil Code claim Community comparative concept concerning consensual consequences considered contract Court creditors debtor decide decision delivery direct dispose distinction draft droit effect entitled European example exceptions existence fact faith French functional German give Group hand important insolvency intellectual property rights interests issue legal systems limited means movables nature object obligation owner ownership Paris pass person possession possible practice principle priority private law problem property law proprietary protection publicity question reason refer regard Regulation relation requirement respect result rights in rem risk rules seller situation solution specific supra footnote supra note thing third party tion trade tradition transaction transfer transfer of movables transfer of ownership transferor unitary validity