Ethnic Groups in Conflict, Updated Edition With a New Preface
University of California Press, 2001 M04 9 - 720 pages
Drawing material from dozens of divided societies, Donald L. Horowitz constructs his theory of ethnic conflict, relating ethnic affiliations to kinship and intergroup relations to the fear of domination. A groundbreaking work when it was published in 1985, the book remains an original and powerfully argued comparative analysis of one of the most important forces in the contemporary world.
Other editions - View all
Africa Alliance areas army attempt backward become boundaries British Ceylon Chinese civil civilian claims coalition colonial common Comparative competition composition constitution countries coup course created cultural demands Development differences divided divisions domination East economic effect election electoral elite emerged equal ethnic conflict ethnic groups ethnic party example fear Federal followed forces identity important independence Indian interests issues Kurds language leaders less lines London majority Malay Malaysia means ment military minority movement multiethnic Muslim Nigeria North Northern officers opportunities opposition organization party system percent Pluralism Politics population position possible preferences presented Press Princeton produce ranked reason regime region relations result rule seats secession separatist single Sinhalese Social societies Southern Sri Lanka strong structure Studies Tamil tend territorial theory tion Uganda units Univ vote West York
Page 24 - In their consequences they differ precisely in this way: ethnic coexistences condition a mutual repulsion and disdain but allow each ethnic community to consider its own honor as the highest one; the caste structure brings about a social subordination and an acknowledgment of 'more honor' in favor of the privileged caste and status groups. This is due to the fact that in the caste structure ethnic distinctions as such have become 'functional...
Page 23 - status' segregation grown into a 'caste' differs in its structure from a mere 'ethnic' segregation: the caste structure transforms the horizontal and unconnected coexistences of ethnically segregated groups into a vertical social system of super- and subordination. Correctly formulated: a comprehensive societalization integrates the ethnically divided communities into specific political and communal action.